VC Guide

Anonymous fund & investor partner reviews by founders for founders.
NPS scores for VC's.

John Sechrest

Seattle Angel Conference

This Reviewer Says They Received Funding
Authority to Write Check:
Review Rating

6.75

6

How Well Do You Know This Investor?

Have known the investor on and off over a few years

6

John runs the Seattle Angel Conference. It is an annual "fund" where newly minted angel investors are supposed to learn the angel investing process. John can be a gruff guy, but he means well. The trouble is the Fund itself. It is unpredictable, disorganized, and there is zero ability for the entrepreneur to know if they are a fit for the fund because there is not a consistent thesis. They run a pitch competition of all of the companies as their means to determine who to fund. They also require a $100 application fee. This means that a company can apply multiple years in a row with wildly different results. John does not manage this mess well, which is unfortunate for the companies paying to play. One on one John knows his stuff and is willing to make introductions, but when he convinces you to do the fund competition, it sours the impression, quite often. The fund may be good for new angels and it has value there, but now that they have opened it virtually to companies from all over, it has made it a bigger circus with less value to the Seattle local companies than before. Only the most connected companies stand a chance because a large part of the pitch competition is a popularity contest to get angels to support you.
Verified Investor Response:
Understands Market:
Responsive:
7
Respectful to Founders:
Decisive (Quick to Decision):
Adds Value:
6
Sharp/Pushes Thinking:
Cares About Equality:
I Trust This Investor:
8
No BS (Delivers):
Would You Recommend This Investor?
6
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

0

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

For Investors:

We believe that there are always two sides to every story and accountability goes both ways, so we want to allow for investors to respond to their own reviews. Please navigate to the link below to leave a reply.

Investors: Respond to a Review

The Review Discussion Board

We encourage as much discussion as possible here on VC Guide. With that said, we currently use an integration called Disqus for our comment functionality.

To leave anonymous comments:
1. Leave your comment
2. Add a nickname, pseudonym, or initials below in the comment submission box
3. Check the "I'd rather post as a guest box"
4. Leave a fake email (like 123@gmail.com)
5. Press the Arrow Button on the bottom right

Once you leave a comment, one of our VC Guide Community Moderators will check to approve it. Remember please do not disparage people unnecessarily and act in good faith within the VC Guide Community Guidelines. All comments are moderated. Of course, you are more than free to use your real name and/or email. Our intention is to make VC Guide a comfortable place for anyone to discuss their thoughts.